お知らせ

  • 利用規約を守って投稿してください。また、よくある質問および投稿の手引きも参照してください。
  • メッセージの投稿にはアカウントが必要です。未登録の方は、ユーザ登録ページからアカウントを作成することができます。

#1 2013-08-29 22:03:20

bonbonboby
メンバ
登録日: 2012-08-08

lm-sensorsをうまく機能させたいです

ubuntu 12.04LTS
マザボ:GA-8S661FXMP-RZ
グラボ:GeForce6200
cpu:pen4 3.2GHz-HT(HT有効)
lm-sensorsをインストールしsensors-detectを実行
再起動後、GKrellMを起動するとグラボ温度は読み取れるのですが、他はだめです。
やってみたことを貼ります。
#sensors-detect
# sensors-detect revision 5984 (2011-07-10 21:22:53 +0200)
# Board: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-8S661FXMP-RZ

This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
unless you know what you're doing.

Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors.
Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): yes
Module cpuid loaded successfully.
Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595...                       No
VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors...                          No
VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors...                            No
AMD K8 thermal sensors...                                   No
AMD Family 10h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 11h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors...                   No
AMD Family 15h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 15h power sensors...                             No
Intel digital thermal sensor...                             No
Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor...                         No
VIA C7 thermal sensor...                                    No
VIA Nano thermal sensor...                                  No

Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to
standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): yes
Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'...               No
Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'...               No
Trying family `ITE'...                                      Yes
Found `ITE IT8705F Super IO Sensors'                        Success!
    (address 0x290, driver `it87')
Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'...               No
Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'...               No
Trying family `ITE'...                                      Yes
Found `ITE IT8705F Super IO Sensors'                        Success!
    (address 0x290, driver `it87')

Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common interfaces
through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other things.
We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it
there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such
interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI
interfaces? (YES/no): yes
Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0...                      No
Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8...                     No

Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports.
We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually
safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any
ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (yes/NO): yes
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290...       No
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290...       No
Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290...                   No
Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290...                   No

Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware
monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works
reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble
on some systems.
Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no): yes
Sorry, no supported PCI bus adapters found.
Module i2c-dev loaded successfully.

Next adapter: NVIDIA i2c adapter 0 at 1:00.0 (i2c-0)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): yes
Client found at address 0x50
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 No
Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                Yes
    (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)

Next adapter: NVIDIA i2c adapter 1 at 1:00.0 (i2c-1)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): yes

Next adapter: NVIDIA i2c adapter 2 at 1:00.0 (i2c-2)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): yes

Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
Just press ENTER to continue:

Driver `it87':
  * ISA bus, address 0x290
    Chip `ITE IT8705F Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)

To load everything that is needed, add this to /etc/modules:
#----cut here----
# Chip drivers
it87
#----cut here----
If you have some drivers built into your kernel, the list above will
contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones!

Do you want to add these lines automatically to /etc/modules? (yes/NO)yes

Unloading i2c-dev... OK
Unloading cpuid... OK

これで再起動するとGKrellMでグラボ温度のみ表示できます。
/etc/modulesを確認しましたが、確かにit87は追記されてます。
以下は役に立つかはわかりませんが・・・
#service module-init-tools start
module-init-tools stop/waiting
#sensors
No sensors found!
Make sure you loaded all the kernel drivers you need.
Try sensors-detect to find out which these are.
#dmesg | grep it87
[    9.035864] it87: Found IT8705F chip at 0x290, revision 3
[    9.035944] ACPI: resource it87 [io  0x0295-0x0296] conflicts with ACPI region IP__ [io 0x295-0x296]
[ 2431.015225] it87: Found IT8705F chip at 0x290, revision 3
[ 2431.015311] ACPI: resource it87 [io  0x0295-0x0296] conflicts with ACPI region IP__ [io 0x295-0x296]
長々申し訳ないです。どなたかアドバイスいただけると助かります。
よろしくお願いします。

オフライン

 

#2 2013-08-30 00:06:56

bonbonboby
メンバ
登録日: 2012-08-08

Re: lm-sensorsをうまく機能させたいです

自己解決しました。
ダメ元で
https://forums.ubuntulinux.jp/viewtopic.php?id=13726
こちらを参考にetc/default/grubを変更したらOKでした。
スレ自体は見てたのですが、さっぱり意味がわからないので、
私のケースとは違うのだろうと思い、また起動できなくなる不安からスルーしてましたが、
やっぱり試してみようと思った次第です。
お騒がせしました。

オフライン

 

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB